It's obvious really, not quite sure why I didn't see it.
The European large combustion plant directive requires either plants to shut down, or fit sulphur capture technology. Some plants are shutting, some are investing millions in fitting the sulphur capture technology.
Why would these plants (which are complying and fitting the technology) close?
It's obvious - they won't. Rather a bit of work will be done to keep them running for the next, well, who knows how long.
As far as I can see this means the following plants will have life extension work completed:
Installation | Installed capacity (MWe) | Number of boilers | Capacity opted in (MW) | Capacity opted out (MW) |
Drax | 3,960 | 6 | 3,960 | 0 |
Eggborough | 2,000 | 4 | 2,000 | 0 |
Cottam | 2,000 | 4 | 2,000 | 0 |
Ferrybridge | 2,000 | 4 | 1,000 | 1,000 |
Fiddlers Ferry | 2,000 | 4 | 2,000 | 0 |
Ratcliffe | 2,000 | 4 | 2,000 | 0 |
Rugeley | 1,000 | 2 | 1,000 | 0 |
West Burton | 2,000 | 4 | 2,000 | 0 |
Longannet | 2,304 | 4 | 2,304 | 0 |
Aberthaw | 1,500 | 3 | 1,500 | 0 |
Kilroot | 520 | 2 | 520 | 0 |
Uskmouth | 393 | 3 | 393 | 0 |
This represents 65% of our current installed coal and oil generation capacity - the rest will close.
That's quite a bit then!
1 comment:
Hi Mark,
I`m looking into ccs at the moment. I`d like to send you the 4 page summary of what my research has found so far. contact me by email if you are interested.
calvin.jones(a)gmail.com
Post a Comment